Quote:
Originally Posted by BradS7535
I'm wondering why you would stay with the 2006.
Condensed version of the mess in my head:
As of this moment, I have not seen either in person (2006 is shipping from Ohio today). Essentially price is a wash between the 2 (including the shipping on the 2006). The 2009 is newer and has more options. Right now I am going on the word of the RV guy who sold me the 2006 that everything is working and in good condition as I haven't seen it myself. I will be able to inspect the 2009 on Saturday (maybe even side-by-side with the 2006 if it gets delivered. If both units are in good working order and similar condition, why would you "stay the course" with the 2006?
|
Good point, and I'll attempt to clarify. For me any decision involving different used cars options or in this case different RV's, I have to look at true "cost" of going from one option to another.
I understand your point on the price being a "wash" between them, but what I am asking is that the true "cost" of moving from one to the other? Not just money, but your time also?
For the 2009 TM, you'll need to take the time to see it this weekend; for me that was easily an entire day, but kinda fun since my son was with me.
Now the not so fun time: selling the 2006 TM. You'll need to prep the 2006 TM, get pictures, put it in CL or rvtrader.com, and then take calls. Given you have a hot product, you'll need to wade through MANY calls and emails, find the right person/persons, schedule time with each, and then sell it to someone who hopefully will have the money.
So if you have already added in the "cost" of your time to do all of the above (minimum of 2-3 days to whatever it takes to sell it (weeks?)) then no question you get the 2009 TM (assuming it checks out of course); complete no brainer!