TrailManor Owner's Forum  

Go Back   TrailManor Owner's Forum > TrailManor Technical Discussions > Towing and Hitching
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-04-2014, 08:23 AM   #1
Padgett
TrailManor Master
 
Padgett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,796
Default Diesel vs Gas

Having just sold my Vixen I no longer have a diesel but was amazed at the 2.4 liter 6's ability to move the 6500 lb rig.

If a diesel had been available when I bought the GC, I would have seriously considered it because of the added efficiency, but not for the premium demanded.

When gas was cheap, a big (400 cid) V8 was my preference but that was when American 6 cyl were small and underporered, the V6 in my GC has more HP than the V8 Pontiac (in fact it has more power than an E-Jag) & in the interim I used a 3800 V6 Buick in a minivan for towing (but was always overloaded). A selling point of the GC was the 5,000# rating for the towing package and under $30k OTD (new was only a few hundred more than used and dealer had exactly what I wanted).

OTOH the VM diesel in the '14s is a wonderful engine with 420 lb-ft of torque from a 3.0 DOHC turbo V6. The problem is the $4500 option plus it is only available in "upscale" versions (have a convertible, do not want a panoramic sunroof) so the total is north of $45k.

So you have a $15k shot there and in Florida 87 PON is now $3.25 and Diesel is $4/gallon. So I am paying 20% less at the pump for 22% worse MPG (18vs23). Break even is not this century.

This could change. In many parts of the country diesel fuel is less than 87 PON and eventually CJF may offer the diesel in the Laredo trim (no sunroof).

And on the gripping hand, direct injection allows diesel like CR and much higher RPM from 87 PON gasahol engines so the only thing we know about the future is that it will be different.

ps didn't mention 4 or 8 cyl engines. Have no use for them this century. YMMV.
__________________
Looking for a 24/17 in or near Florida.
Padgett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 08:35 AM   #2
Redtail Cruiser
TrailManor Master
 
Redtail Cruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: North San Diego County (Fallbrook)
Posts: 632
Default

That is a lot of info, with the point being...?
__________________
Tim




"A man creates his own legacy. Create a legendary life"
Redtail Cruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 10:42 AM   #3
Padgett
TrailManor Master
 
Padgett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,796
Default

Helps me to refine my thinking and may help others. Point being that while diesel is great, unless you already have one, it may not make sense economically. Secondly that with direct injection (like in the EcoBoost) & boost, 87 PON may approach (but doubt that it will reach) diesel efficiency.

The correlary being why have Fords with Ecoboost V6s reported such poor MPG ? Do they need a good tune ? First though being at what PLA (throttle position) does the engine go into PE (power enrichment) and could that be raised ? (mine occurs at about 53% and I can see the pulse width of the injectors increase (need the Torque Pro app and a $12 OBD-II dongle).

If anyone is interested we could get really deep into maximising MPG when towing a TM on the flats. With particular attention on when to dowshift if it will keep you out of PE.

So to answer your question, it was a lead-in to see if anyone was interested in a deep discussion including why you need to know precisely how your engine is running.

Also I have found (small sample but high probability) that just by having average drivers know what is happening (proper instrumentation) their driving habits change and mpg improves. Back in the first fuel crisis the EPA (then the FEA) found that just adding a vaccuum gauge resulted in improved MPG.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	7tabtorque.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	95.8 KB
ID:	10438  
__________________
Looking for a 24/17 in or near Florida.
Padgett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 04:14 PM   #4
Redtail Cruiser
TrailManor Master
 
Redtail Cruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: North San Diego County (Fallbrook)
Posts: 632
Default

OK, I just got back from 2,300 mile trip towing my TM, that took me to the Grand Canyon, Zion NP, cross the Rockies to Fort Collins and then back across the Rockies home to San Diego. My Ecoboost, on 87, averaged 14.3 MPG on cruise control set between 62 to 65mph, using my Tow/haul feature the entire trip. More than my old truck could have dreamed of.

I think that is decent mileage for a 4x4 towing a TM. My mileage without towing averages 17.4 mpg on flat Socal roads with 80% highway and 20% stop & go city. Again that is a lot better numbers that I got out of my '03 F150 w/ the 5.4L v8.

Good mileage is a relative term. Sure I could have gotten better MPG, if I would have waited to get the new Ecodiesel that Dodge just came out with, but I don't like Dodge trucks. So why would someone want to buy and drive a vehicle that they don't like, just to get better fuel mileage? Short answer is, they wouldn't.

As far as wanting to have a deep discussion about the pros and cons, I prefer to just pack it up and "go camping", rather than clutter my mind with "what if's and why's". But to each their own.
__________________
Tim




"A man creates his own legacy. Create a legendary life"
Redtail Cruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 04:47 PM   #5
hillbillyhotel
TrailManor Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: EAST TENNESSEE
Posts: 699
Default

( Good mileage is a relative term)

just let me say , that says it all,
on our last trip, was tickled to death @ 12 mpg,
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

RANDY & VICKIE
2003 3124 KS
TV 02 AVALANCHE 2500 4X4 8.1L
W/ PRODIGY B.C.,MAXXIS 10 PLY,HONDA 3000I

TM HISTORY
(88) TM 25 KING, (91) TM 23,(98) 3023, (03) 3124KS
hillbillyhotel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2014, 05:46 PM   #6
MT Camper
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Havre Montana
Posts: 122
Red face My camping thoughts

I have to admit that I don't check my MPG because if I did I'd think I can't afford to go camping as much. I prefer to be in denial. I love to go and don't want anything to clutter my mind about camping that would be negative. Therefore the denial will continue.

By the way I do try to keep my foot off the gas petal when I can't use cruise control because I know I will get better MPG and trailers have a towing speed limit. Therefore I am doing my part as far as I am concerned.

Just my thoughts.
__________________
2010 2619 TM
2012 Dodge Dakota
MT Camper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2014, 08:45 PM   #7
hillbillyhotel
TrailManor Master
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: EAST TENNESSEE
Posts: 699
Default

mt
lol I agree, this is the first time I have checked a hole trip, I don't get any mpg not towing in her truck,,, but from Sidney oh. to summerset ky. was 15 mpg (flat land) on last trip, then the mountains, 9 mpg then, so at 12 mpg for the 1k trip I was ok with
but in my dodge , in denial also, I just keep it on temp. don't want to see the mpg. it's a dodge thing , had lots of them,
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

RANDY & VICKIE
2003 3124 KS
TV 02 AVALANCHE 2500 4X4 8.1L
W/ PRODIGY B.C.,MAXXIS 10 PLY,HONDA 3000I

TM HISTORY
(88) TM 25 KING, (91) TM 23,(98) 3023, (03) 3124KS
hillbillyhotel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2014, 05:49 AM   #8
davlin
TrailManor Master
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 489
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redtail Cruiser View Post
OK, I just got back from 2,300 mile trip towing my TM, that took me to the Grand Canyon, Zion NP, cross the Rockies to Fort Collins and then back across the Rockies home to San Diego. My Ecoboost, on 87, averaged 14.3 MPG on cruise control set between 62 to 65mph, using my Tow/haul feature the entire trip. More than my old truck could have dreamed of.

I think that is decent mileage for a 4x4 towing a TM. My mileage without towing averages 17.4 mpg on flat Socal roads with 80% highway and 20% stop & go city. Again that is a lot better numbers that I got out of my '03 F150 w/ the 5.4L v8.
I agree that those are excellent towing mpg numbers! I could live with those, but I've read on other forums from Ecoboost owners that they are getting around 9 mpg while towing. I couldn't live with that. I'm guessing that I have a heavier total load (3124KS versus 2720) than you, which will effect overall mpg, but I drive about the same speed, which is also a major contributor to mpg, especially while towing.

My truck is primarily a tow vehicle (it is the third vehicle in a two person family), so non-towing mpg aren't as important to me.

Maybe some of the other Ecoboost TM members will join in with their experiences in towing mpg?

Dave
davlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2014, 05:56 AM   #9
MarkoPolo
TrailManor Master
 
MarkoPolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Greeley, Colorado
Posts: 314
Default

I typically get 14-16 mpg towing in the Colorado mountains. Usually 12 mpg going uphill and 18 mpg downhill. I'll get 18-20 mpg with just the truck.
__________________
Mark & Claudia - Greeley, Colorado
2016 Lance model 1995
2013 Ford Lariat F-150 Super Crew Eco-boost with 4x4 Off Road & Max Tow
MarkoPolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2014, 06:52 AM   #10
Redtail Cruiser
TrailManor Master
 
Redtail Cruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: North San Diego County (Fallbrook)
Posts: 632
Default

Hey Hillbilly, I thought an Avalanche was a GM product. What kind of Dodge are you driving?

Mark, what grade of gas are you using? I've heard some are getting better mileage with higher octane.
__________________
Tim




"A man creates his own legacy. Create a legendary life"
Redtail Cruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gas leak on Hot Water Tank! woodlandcottage Appliances 5 04-07-2014 06:24 PM
Main gas line problem JANETT Appliances 8 03-24-2014 07:28 AM
Refrigerator on propane problem skiman747 Appliances 51 06-04-2013 06:36 PM
Unsafe gas line to water heater ? Goodyear Travels Plumbing 4 10-03-2010 06:58 AM
Gas won't fire on hot water heater HappyWDWCampers Plumbing 3 07-22-2010 09:09 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2022 Trailmanor Owners Page.