Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuscany Bandit
Wayne,
I can understand your frustration.
When you took the measurements when opened did you measure from the VERY back of the shell to the Very front of the coupler, with the swing-a-way tongue (if you have one) in place as in towing? That length should be the 27 foot.
The next question might be...is your 1998 model any different from the newer models as to length?
I have the 2720SL, but it is in the garage so I can't measure it when opened.
|
I measured from the front most point of the trailer (which is the top shell) to the rear most point of the trailer (which is also the top shell).
I measured the trailer when I took the picture below, with the trailer open and hitched to the TV. The top shell extends beyond the trailer tongue (by about 2") and far beyond the rear bumper and spare tire.
The new trailers are exactly the same.
I just feel that TM has created a controversy that didn't need to be created. All they had to do is call it a 2420 and say that it is 24' (open). I just don't see the upside to calling it a 27'. That's kinda like calling a 24' Catalina sailboat a Catalina 27 because the manufacturer thinks that it looks bigger than it is.
My daughter has a 27' Travel trailer. There is
NO WAY that you can compare the 2 trailers. They have a full walk-around queen size bedroom forward that you can walk around and sit on the bed. There is a full size livingroom with a separate dinette. A full size refrigerator freezer and 3 bunk-beds and a real bathroom with a full stall shower. Their trailer is also 8' wide instead of 7'7" wide. That makes a big difference. To state that the 2720 is comparable to a 27' travel trailer is simply laughable.
I realize that the TM is not about "size". It is about towing and storing. I just don't understand why TM makes an issue about something that they don't need to. It just seems reckless, irresponsible and down-right dishonest.
I just think that whoever is responsible for their marketing took liberties that were not necessary.