View Single Post
Old 05-09-2013, 11:51 PM   #7
rickst29
yes, they hunt lions.
 
rickst29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 1,318
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShrimpBurrito View Post
....
Where have you read that Trojans (the T-105s and the like) aren't well tuned for being charged by solar setups? Most battery literature I have read, including the windsun.com site and Trojan's site, say deep-cycle batteries should be charged at no more than the C8 rate (or sometimes the higher C10 rate). At the C8 rate, a 2-cell T-105 bank can be charged at 26 amps. Is your solar array putting out more than that? Looks like the setup you just described above is only ~12A (153W).
Yep, no problem with this setup, or even the full 200 watts - which I could get with a switch to MPPT. (Max would be close to 15A in that case).

I started this Thread with a proposal for vastly more PV power basically, 2 * 240W (24V panels). In that kind of configuration, 35A would not be impossible - and that could lead to temp sensor "throttling" of the Bulk charge cycle, unless I also did a big upgrade to the battery bank.
__________________
TM='06 2619 w/5K axle, 15" Maxxis "E" tires. Plumbing protector. 630 watts solar. 450AH LiFePO4 batteries, 3500 watt inverter. CR-1110 E-F/S fridge (compressor).
TV = 2007 4runner sport, with a 36 volt "power boost".
rickst29 is online now   Reply With Quote